Update LLMInterface to restore LC compatibility #416
Conversation
This file contains hidden or bidirectional Unicode text that may be interpreted or compiled differently than what appears below. To review, open the file in an editor that reveals hidden Unicode characters.
Learn more about bidirectional Unicode characters
stellasia
force-pushed
the
feature/improved-llm-interface
branch
2 times, most recently
from
3475e0b to
2c4f4e5
Compare
| print(res.content) | ||
|
|
||
| # If rate_limit_handler and async_rate_limit_handler decorators are used and you want to use a custom rate limit handler | ||
| # Type variables for function signatures used in rate limit handlers |
There was a problem hiding this comment.
the above comments on how to customise a rate limit handler are still valid no?
There was a problem hiding this comment.
Yes, actually only the first "If" is not needed anymore, as the rate limit handler is applied to all LLMs now. If reintroduced the rest of the comment.
stellasia
force-pushed
the
feature/improved-llm-interface
branch
from
c229aa3 to
d9c0f21
Compare
stellasia
force-pushed
the
feature/improved-llm-interface
branch
from
d9c0f21 to
7a4d4a0
Compare
Sign up for free
to join this conversation on GitHub.
Already have an account?
Sign in to comment
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
This suggestion is invalid because no changes were made to the code.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is closed.
Suggestions cannot be applied while viewing a subset of changes.
Only one suggestion per line can be applied in a batch.
Add this suggestion to a batch that can be applied as a single commit.
Applying suggestions on deleted lines is not supported.
You must change the existing code in this line in order to create a valid suggestion.
Outdated suggestions cannot be applied.
This suggestion has been applied or marked resolved.
Suggestions cannot be applied from pending reviews.
Suggestions cannot be applied on multi-line comments.
Suggestions cannot be applied while the pull request is queued to merge.
Suggestion cannot be applied right now. Please check back later.
Description
Restore LangChain chat models compatibility in the LLMInterface:
inputparameter for allinvokemethod now acceptsUnion[str, list[LLMMessage]], whereLLMMessageis aTypedDictwith role/content keys.system_instructionsandmessage_historyis translated into alist[LLMMessage]that is being passed down to the corresponding_invokemethod._invokemethods.Type of Change
Complexity
Complexity: Low (many changes, but just refactoring in the end)
How Has This Been Tested?
Checklist
The following requirements should have been met (depending on the changes in the branch):